God Does Not Play Dice: The Bohr-Einstein Debates

Two of the twentieth century's greatest minds spent decades arguing about the nature of reality itself — and remained devoted friends the whole time.

Rivals & Friendships · 3 min read ·

God Does Not Play Dice: The Bohr-Einstein Debates
en:Paul Ehrenfest, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

It began, oddly enough, with light. In 1905, Albert Einstein proposed that light sometimes behaves not as a wave but as a particle — a 'light quantum,' later called the photon. Niels Bohr, the young Danish physicist who would soon revolutionize atomic theory, hated the idea. To Bohr, letting light be sometimes a particle and sometimes a wave meant a scientist would have to arbitrarily choose between equations, and that felt like an abdication of rigor. Bohr held out against the photon until 1925, even as Arthur Compton's 1922 experiment offered strong evidence for it.

Bohr's own resistance led him, along with Hans Kramers and John Slater, to propose in 1924 that energy conservation applied only to statistical averages, not to individual events — a theory known as BKS. It was a direct challenge to one of Einstein's convictions. But in 1925, the Bothe-Geiger coincidence experiment demolished BKS, vindicating Einstein's insistence that energy was conserved collision by collision. It was an early skirmish in what would become a lifelong intellectual war.

Then came the quantum revolution of the mid-1920s. Erwin Schrödinger produced his wave equation, and Einstein wrote back praising it as a work of 'true genius.' Meanwhile Werner Heisenberg's 1925 paper stripped away the old Newtonian notions of space and time as fixed underlying realities, reinterpreting mechanics through matrix-like operators. A year later, Max Born, working with Heisenberg, proposed that the new mechanics should be understood fundamentally through probability, with no deeper causal story beneath it.

This was too much for Einstein — and for Schrödinger too. Both rejected Born's renunciation of causality, a principle that had survived even the upheaval of general relativity. In a now-famous 1926 letter to Born, Einstein wrote that quantum mechanics was 'certainly imposing,' but that 'an inner voice' told him it wasn't yet the real thing — that it did not bring physicists closer to the secrets of the 'old one.' 'I, at any rate, am convinced that He is not playing at dice,' he wrote.

Even Heisenberg and Bohr disagreed at first — over whether matrix mechanics and wave mechanics were truly compatible, and over Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, which Bohr initially opposed. But by the fifth Solvay Conference in October 1927, Heisenberg and Born declared the revolution complete: nothing further, they believed, needed to be worked out. For Einstein, this was the moment his skepticism turned to genuine dismay.