Excalibur: The Sword That Made a King

A blade in an anvil, a hand rising from a lake — the story of Excalibur is really two swords wearing one legend.

Legends & Folk Tales · 3 min read ·

Excalibur: The Sword That Made a King
Internet Archive Book Images, No restrictions, via Wikimedia Commons

Long before Excalibur became a household word, it was Caledfwlch — a name carved into Welsh tales like Culhwch and Olwen centuries before anyone in France or England wrote of Arthur pulling a sword from stone. The word itself is built from caled, 'hard', and bwlch, 'breach' or 'cleft', and scholars have long noticed its kinship with Caladbolg, a sword wielded by heroes of Irish mythology. Whether one name borrowed from the other or both sprang independently from an ancient shared idea of what a legendary sword should be called, no one can say for certain.

It was the Welsh cleric Geoffrey of Monmouth who first gave the sword a form that later ages would recognize, Latinising it as Caliburnus in his Historia Regum Britanniae around 1136 — possibly nodding to the Latin word for steel, chalybs, itself borrowed from Greek. Geoffrey Gaimar, writing his Old French chronicle Estoire des Engleis in the years just after, called it Caliburc, tying it to Arthur and his nephew Constantine. Then came Wace, whose Roman de Brut scattered a dizzying array of spellings across its manuscripts — Caliburn, Calabrun, Escalibor — a linguistic sword passed hand to hand until it settled, centuries later, into the familiar Excalibur.

But a name is not yet a legend, and the legend's most famous scene belongs to a different French poet. Around 1200, Robert de Boron wrote Merlin, the first known account of a sword lodged in a stone atop an anvil, appearing mysteriously in a churchyard on Christmas Eve. Merlin had prophesied that only the true, divinely appointed heir of Uther Pendragon could draw it free. Nobles tried and failed. Thomas Malory, writing his own version centuries later in Le Morte d'Arthur, put the promise plainly: whoever pulled the sword from stone and anvil was rightful king of all England.

Arthur, in this telling, had no idea he was Uther's son. Raised believing himself the child of Ector, he came to the churchyard only as squire to his foster brother Kay — and pulled the sword free without effort, almost by accident, unseen by anyone. He replaced it, then drew it again in public once Merlin arrived to reveal his true parentage. It was the Prose Merlin, part of the sprawling thirteenth-century Lancelot-Grail cycle, that finally named this stone-sword explicitly as Excalibur.

Yet the story does not end with a coronation. In the same cycle's finale, the Vulgate Mort Artu, a dying Arthur orders his knight Griflet to hurl Excalibur into a nearby lake. Griflet, unwilling to discard so great a weapon, tries twice to deceive his king before finally obeying. A hand rises from the water to catch the blade; Morgan then arrives by boat to carry Arthur away to Avalon. Later English tradition would shift this final act from Griflet onto the more familiar Sir Bedivere.